AllPros Logo
    Our DNA
    For creators
    AllPros Logo

    Pour les apprenants

    • Trouver des programmes vérifiés
    • Créateurs les mieux notés
    • Sélection Allpros
    • Signaler un programme

    Pour les créateurs

    • Demander la vérification
    • Obtenir une note AllPros
    • Tableau de bord créateur

    Entreprise

    • Notre DNA
    • Nous contacter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Service
    • FAQ
    Joe Natoli
    Profil non revendiqué

    Avis du cours GenAI Fundamentals for UX Designers + Researchers par Joe Natoli

    Avis de la communauté

    Learn the key concepts and components to harness GenAI for UX design — and lead AI product innovation efforts.

    Format d'apprentissage Online Course
    Sous-catégorie Figma

    Prix du cours $49.99

    Note AllPros :

    0.00/ 10

    Basé sur : 0 avis

    Visiter le site

    Le cours de Joe Natoli est-il sérieux ?

    Généré à partir d'avis d'utilisateurs réels

    À propos de Joe Natoli

    Learn the key concepts and components to harness GenAI for UX design — and lead AI product innovation efforts.

    Qui est Joe Natoli ?

    Aucune bio disponible.

    Secteur

    Design

    Nombre total d'élèves

    33,611 students

    Site officiel

    —

    Expérience

    Langue du cours

    English

    Réseaux sociaux

    Basé à

    Que apprend-on dans le cours de Joe Natoli ?

    Learn core principles of responsible GenAI design that ensure our products serve all users equally + equitably.
    Success factors unique to Machine Learning (ML) products that UX + Product Designers and their teams should adopt
    Guidance on research to determine what kinds of problems are best solved by AI, and where human control should remain central.
    Determining when AI features are appropriate for users — and when they aren't
    Identifying when Automation (AI does the task for users) or Augmentation (help them do it better) is more appropriate.
    Designing the reward function and appropriately considering the balance between false positives and false negatives.
    Essential factors to consider when evaluating the reward function.
    How to weigh necessary, unavoidable tradeoffs between precision and recall, which is key to shaping an AI user experience.
    Designing for fairness and inclusion, from objectives to datasets to guidance on bias testing.
    Designing for generative variability: how do we present multiple, varied outputs to users — and how do we guide them in selecting the best one?
    Designing for multiple outputs: how do we help users filter and highlight differences between outputs?
    Designing for imperfections: how do we empower users to manage + mitigate imperfections and designing with contextual sensitivity?
    Designing for confidence: how do we design confidence scoring to properly evaluate output quality and increase user trust?
    Rules and examples for applying confidence scores.
    Designing for co-creation: how to we design co-creation processes where both the user and the AI can make adjustments?
    Designing for generic controls: using "temperature" to control the number of outputs and the degree of variability in those outputs.
    Designing for domain-specific controls, such as encoder-decoder models, semantic sliders and prompt engineering.
    Designing for prompt engineering: enabling and guiding users to effectively use multiple types of conversational prompts.
    Designing for exploration: incorporating flexibility, feedback, transparency and error handling/expectation management.
    Designing for choice, feedback, transparency + safety: centering users as active, empowered participants in the creation process.
    Designing for mental models: orienting users to generative variability, teaching effective use and teaching the AI about the user.
    Designing for explanation, understanding + trust: providing clear rationales for outputs, using friction to curb over-reliance and showing imperfections.
    Designing against harm: understanding the critical ways irresponsible AI design can harm people.
    Designing against hazardous outputs: discrimination, exclusion, toxicity, misinformation, deep fakes, IP theft and more.
    Mitigating harm with a Value-Sensitive Design (VSD) process, integrated with an Agile or Lean development process.
    0.00

    Basé sur :

    0

    Avis vérifiés

    Aidez les autres à faire un choix plus sûr.

    Note 10
    0
    Note 9
    0
    Note 8
    0
    Note 7
    0
    Note 6
    0
    Note 5
    0
    Note 4
    0
    Note 3
    0
    Note 2
    0
    Note 1
    0

    Avis du cours de Joe Natoli

    Basé sur 0 avis vérifiés d'étudiants

    0.00

    Basé sur 0 avis

    10.0
    0
    9.0
    0
    8.0
    0
    7.0
    0
    6.0
    0
    5.0
    0
    4.0
    0
    3.0
    0
    2.0
    0
    1.0
    0

    Les avis sur AllPros reflètent les opinions et expériences d’utilisateurs. Les créateurs peuvent gérer leur page et répondre aux avis, mais AllPros n’écrit ni ne contrôle les avis.

    Aucun avis

    Ce créateur n’a pas encore reçu d’avis.